Walking and Street Trash

15 December 2012. The day in review. 

(1)  Walking

You all know that the British drive on the wrong side of the road. But, at least they do so consistently. When it comes to walking, it's a different story.

For consistency's sake, some, say half, want to walk on left side of a pedestrian street. According to one cabbie in Birmingham (UK not Alabama - something to remind your small town airport check-in staff of if flying to Birmingham, UK, say from Gainesville, Florida), this has everything to do with the placement of one's lance 'whilst' jousting. Most people are right handed. So, the majority of lances were held in the right hand. That meant driving your horse up the left side of your opponent. I've never seen anyone hold a lance while driving a car, but the British do love their heritage. (This, by the way is the reason that they make Americans living in the UK learn how to drive. The lance in the modern horseless conveyance is a stick-shift, which is daftly handled in the left hand.)

Meanwhile, the other half of British pedestrians walk on the right. I firmly believe that these are contrarians. Only countries that have experienced revolutions drive on the right side of the road. France. The USA. Haiti. Venezuela. The Russian Federation. (I predict, incidentally, that the U.S. Virgin Islands will never throw off its colonial yolk for this simple reason: they drive on the left, mostly with American cars, which makes riding through the narrow streets of Charlotte Amalie, the capital of the USVI, something of a seat-of-your pants thrill for a passenger in a colleague's car.) 

The result, amongst pedestrians, is a super-collider on a human scale. As people try to make their way, chaos - the mathematical patterns of chaos - results. 

Pedestrians in London

Now, why is this important? 

Firstly, it make the British a more tolerant and self-effacing people. Ask yourself, how many times could you excuse yourself for someone bumping into you before you exercise your second amendment rights. Americans, because they all drive and walk down the same side of the street, have a certain directness to them that is, well, direct. I have yet to walk straight down a British street. No wonder the UK is slightly ahead of the USA in matters of equal rights for lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and the transgendered.

Secondly, in American eyes, it makes the British inconsiderate. Not intentionally. If they paid attention to every on-coming obstruction, they'd have a meltdown either from indecision or having to make so many decisions. It is a marvel - and I write this with admiration - a marvel that there are not more accidents. Britons have developed the reverse polarity of magnets. To achieve the same unadulterated sense of personal space a New Yorker has to wait on a rain-storm and start swinging his or her umbrella like Occam's razor.

Sadly this marvel of modern British movement results in the 'law of metal'. If it has more metal than you, you get the hell out of its way. An American cyclist, though he runs red lights as diligently as any British cyclist, would stop to give way to a pedestrian. And, a car's driver in the USA certainly would not roll down his window to scream at the cyclist he's barely clipped, "You don't flippin' pay the road tax, do you!" If it's an American cyclist, he's left with the puzzle: what did he mean when he told you to "get back on the pavement"? The pavement is what they British call the sidewalk. You and the car are riding on what the British call the "tarmac". Lord knows what the planes and jets are flying down. But, if you have to ask, you should review the 'law of metal'.

 

(2)  Street Trash

David Sedaris moved from France to the UK, and . . .   I'll let that sink in. Many people I talk to think that David Sedaris still lives in the USA.  . . . and, what's the first thing out of his pen after he settles in? "The British are pigs!" -- in the Sunday Times (of London) no less.

They are! Pigs. You would have to be blind not to notice. The carefree abandon with which the British abandon stuff on the streets as they walk is impressive in its audacity. It's easy to believe that the entire country operates under the assumption that "Your mother lives here." She probably does: Live here. Before she died, while I lived in Florida, my mother lived in Ohio. That's like saying my British neighbour's mother lives in Finland or Italy. He can drop all the stuff he cares to. His virtual Italian mama might as well be a Pope in the woods. As it is, there's always someone to pick up after him.

Walking the dog up the "High Street" -- that's "down Main Street" in American English -- on a Saturday night, the average American dog walker could be forgiven for concluding that an army of bag-laddies had blown themselves up, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, on the streets and in the parks.

Before moving on, I feel, I need to comment on the difference between Britons walking up High Street and Americans walking down Main Street. It's the riddle of "The Bonnie Banks o' Loch Lomond". America was settled by the Scottish, where as Britain - ask any Englishman - was settled by the English.

Of course, not all of the British are pigs. And, there are pigs in the USA too. There are even historical reasons for this slovenly behavior. While Americans were being blitzed by public service campaigns insisting "put it in the can Gator fan!", the British were in the midst of "The Troubles". The Troubles was that period during the conflict in Northern Ireland when the Irish Republican Army was planting their bombs in trash cans up and down the British isles. The result, whether through the removal of trash cans or blowing them up, was the creation of a nation that discarded its trash anywhere it felt like it. 

Americans taking the UK citizenship test puzzle over the question, "What is the purpose of a wheely bin?" A wheely bin is the ubiquitous British trash bin. We've got black ones for garbage. Green ones for compost. And, Blue ones for recyclables. Any philosophy or linguistics teacher will tell you that a purpose does not necessitate a use. While out walking the dog, you're obliged to pick up its "mess". You tell yourself as you carry it away, "I am a Buddhist monk. And, this bag holds the jewels of refuge: dāna, sīla, and bhāvanā . . . alms, restraint, and concentration." You know that the next trash can you see will probably be back home.

So, what would David Sedaris do? (WWJD? you might ask.) In his Sunday Times article, he asks Britons to be ashamed and to bin it like the good Americans we all suspect they want to be. (They don't want to be European, that's for sure.) BTW: Bin it, that's British English for "put it in the can Manchester United fan".

Discarded nappy - a bag of baby poo.

International Departures: Rock, Paper, Scissors.

This is a story about transportation.  I have none.  Well, actually I have a bike and my own two feet.  But, I have no motorized transport to speak of.  I suppose I could ride the bus, though Cambridge is so walkable that I’d feel ridiculously shameful.  I have occasionally taken the train to distant places: Birmingham, Ely, London, and York, so far.  But, a train is on the order of airplane.  It is not something I ride - not yet anyway - with any regularity.  And, as long as I may remain a tourist in London, the subway is more amusement ride than means of getting here or there.

I have to say that the Tube, London’s underground transport, scares the hell out of me.  But that’s another story, here only in brief.  I should clarify that it is not the tubular stations and roundish trains that scare me.  It is the narrow platforms.  Most of them leave me dizzy.  I’m one of those people that Tube station announcers refer to as having gotten “sick on the tracks”.  That’s a euphemism.  What they mean to say, though English civility prevents them, is “suddenly severed” into, oh, let's see: head, two arms, torso, and two legs.  What’s that: six parts.  Some people might count that as better than drawn and quartered.  But, I hug the station walls, hunched over like a lower-case f and looking to the world like a man who has been homeless for too long.

I have begun studying the Highway Code and other driving instruction manuals helpfully issued by the British government.  The road guide is 250 pages long.  The road sign guide is 100 pages long.  That’s much longer than the short little pamphlets drivers get in the U.S.A.  In one hundred and eighty-five days,  when I can legally take my driving tests, both theoretical and practical - I imagine that I will have a reasonable chance of passing.

One hundred and eighty-five days is the amount of time that the British give foreigners - those of us, anyway, who learned to drive on the wrong side of the road - to forget our bad habits and to learn new ones.  

David isn’t having anything of it.  He is afraid, I suppose, that an old dog can’t be taught new tricks.  When asked recently to lead next summer’s geology study-trip to Spain, his remark was, “Well, at least I can drive there.  I’ll be on the right side of the road.”  Don’t ask me which the right side of the road is.  I’ve never learned to tell my right from my left.  So, I guess David figures that I’m kind of a blank-slate, here.  Ready and able to learn.  That will make me the designated driver in the United Kingdom.  And, that’s saying quite a lot for David who’s never trusted my bat-out-of-hell style of driving.

A Brummie - that’s someone from Birmingham, England - a cab driver once told me that Britons drive on whatever side of the road they drive on because that’s the side of the road they used for jousting.  The comment conjured up visions of cars equipped with harpoons.  It is something I could have used back in Florida with all of its old, slow driver.  But, I haven’t seen it here yet.  I imagine that I will when I really get out on the road.  A country that maintains driving on the jousting side would almost certainly have maintained a jousting tradition of some sort, right?

The jousting comment is easily rationalized.  Most people are and would have been right-handed.  So, they would have carried the jousting pole firmly in their right hand.  Let’s just imagine that a horse, unlike a car, steers itself pretty much with little or no attention.  All one’s left hand would have to do is


hold onto the reins.  If my pole is in my right hand, that must mean that I’m driving on the left side of the road.  On second thought, the logic is kind of counter-intuitive.  It’s far easier to simply maintain that the steering wheel is always near the middle of the road.  Unless, you happen to be in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where all bets are off.  Driving an American car on the left side of the road, as is their custom, is probably necessary to keep the tourists off the roads.  Anyway, here in the United Kingdom, it doesn’t help that Britons park on either side of the road in any direction they please.  It confounds one’s sense of the proper flow of traffic.  And, not a lick more helpful, Britons seem to prefer, when able, to drive in the middle of the road.  That sense of owning the road is probably what gave rise to jousting.

So, why do you think the French drive on the right?  They too had a jousting tradition.  I am certain that the reason had little to do with contemporary Continental advice to Drive right!   I have an idea, thinking ahead to the day I can drive again.  Maybe it was practical experience shifting.  While a lazy leftie can hold the reins of a horse, that left hand has to take charge to shift gears.  Just thinking about it makes the fingers of my left hand slightly dizzy.  - I won’t say “spastic”.  The term is politically incorrect here in the U.K.   The disability of palsy with which the term is associated here, however, more aptly describes the motion sickness of my left hand than does the American sense of “spastic” associated with the self-deprecating awareness of the off-spring of the nouveau riche.  I’m going to have to get a car with automatic transmission to pass my practical test.  Driving a standard transmission here might just trigger one of my, so called, classic migraines.

David’s uncertain ability to drive on the wrong side of the road isn’t the only thing that unnerves him.  ”I’ll be able to read the signs”, he also said of driving in Spain.  I was puzzled by the remark.  ”But, they’re in English here.” I observed.  ”Exactly!” came his reply.  In Spain, you know that you have to translate.  You’re always translating.  In our experience driving in the Mexican highlands, when the sign translated as “The road dissolves ahead of you”, you knew that the road was literally going to dissolve.  And, experience soon taught that it would usually dissolve on a hair-pin turn, falling away into a mountain-side ravine that the locals tried to fill with a bus-load of tourists on their way to Palenque or Oaxaca or San Cristóbal de las Casas.

In the United Kingdom, all of the signs are in English.  If a road sign indicated that the road ahead would dissolve, you'd probably stop in panicked disbelief.  A more likely encounter with a sign indicating a soft verge might leave an American, familiar with converging traffic, wondering if skating across lanes were not only possible but encouraged.  You don’t know what needs to be translated, really.  A “carriageway” is eventually sensible enough as to be understood.  But for the newly arrived American, it might just as readily elicit a sense of driving through Pennsylvania Dutch country.  You go slow, keeping an eye out for horse-and-buggy.

The U.S.A. is the country where the French yogurt company, Danone, decided to go about its business without its e.  Americans would be more likely to think Dan-One than Danon.  We’re a simple people.  Some of us would end up in the supermarket asking for Dan One thinking he might be the store-manager.  ”I need to speak to Dan One.  The commercial said he’d know where to find the new yogurt that will restore my health.”  What then do you think we make of a road sign reading “adverse camber”.  What the hell is a camber?  The more educated of us might recall that Camber was the legendary king after whom Cambria, or ancient Wales, was named.  We might take “adverse camber” as a reminder that we’re not in Wales.  Mindful of dry British humour, such a reminder might make perfectly quirky sense.  Wales, being something like the U.K.’s Oz.  I am not actually certain how an American road sign might label an “adverse camber”.  ”Turns into the gravitation forces of the bend” probably wouldn’t be understood.  My guess is that an American would find the sign “Speed


Kills” on the approach to an adverse camber.  Or, maybe more poetically “Death Awaits” in certain parts of Appalachia.  I’m pretty sure that the simple sign “Bend” suffices.  But, I’m also certain that “Bend” means nothing to us.  ”Yep.  That was a bend!” I’d tell myself taking a curve in the road at 75 mph in a 45 mph zone.  Adverse gravitational effects have always acted upon cars travelling roads made for horses and buggies. 

This is to say nothing of signs indicating multi-lane round-abouts.  They might as well read “three ring circus in hell”.  But, most bear no English other than the names of nearby places.

Neither signage nor the Highway Code is helping me much as a pedestrian.  Road crossings, in the United Kingdom, sometimes present considerable risk.  It doesn’t matter if I’m in a Zebra, a Pelican or a Puffin, or even a Toucan crossing.  What I feel that I sometimes need is a massive Trojan horse.  A prophylaxis.  A personal crossing guard, if not the national guard.  I am not a cat.  I have one life.  I have no aspirations to live it out as a hood ornament.  Not even the slightest curiosity, though I am intrigued by what it might feel like to be a lolly on the windscreen of a lorry, in need of scraping off.  I should Americanize that: I am intrigued by what it might feel like to be taffy on the windshield of a truck, in need of scraping off.

The rule is simple: traffic stops the second I plant one foot inside the crossing.  And, until I do that I’m fair-game to be taken as target practice.  ”Bag the buck, blokes.  C’mon, can’t ya see that target on me vest?”  I prefer to live by a simpler rule: Rock-Paper-Scissors.  Only, rock never crushes scissors.  He might paint them a different colour, however.  If you’re ahead of me you can see why I’m so intrigued with lollies on windscreens.  Bikes take out pedestrians.  Cars take bikes.  Buses take cars, or, lorries take small caravans (um, trucks take out small vans and SUVs).  And, trains on level crossings take buses and lorries.  The rule is based on one simple principle: the more metal you’re pushing, the more clear your right-of-way.  I should put that in terms Americans can easily understand: might makes right.  

Honestly, I am amazed, actually, that Cambridge is rated as one of the United Kingdom’s safest cities vis-à-vis traffic accidents.  Mindfully, as a pedestrian, one has to realize that one is at the lower end of the food chain.  No one crosses the road without looking both ways.  This caution lends a keen sense of irony to driving scenes in the British sit-com Keeping Up Appearances.  That oft-repeated line, “Mind the pedestrian, Richard”, spoken by character of Hyacinth Bucket to her husband is awfully hilarious.  Drivers do yield to a pedestrian crossing an intersection, but the pedestrian yields to the bike and car more generally, except at a signalled crossing.

For a cyclist, the fun begins in the bike lane, presuming there is a bike lane.  Bike lanes are easily followed where they exist.  They’re painted blood red, probably with real blood.  There aren’t many bike lanes.  So, if they are painted with real blood, that is probably good.  There certainly seems to be enough cause for blood to be spilled.  Just before the year-end holidays, the local newspaper ran as series of He-said/She-said articles.  He, by the way, was the driver of a sport-car.  She was a cyclist.  It just happened that way.  In reality, the sexes are equally represented among both car drivers and cyclists.   The commentary of each on the other, however, was a vicious as any arising out of the 1970’s sex wars.  The enmity of the opposing camps aside, real circumstances: road quality and the number of people on the road regardless form of transportation, render selfishness a third and distant wheel.

I’ve seen bikes travelling 15 mph passed by cars going 30 to 40 mph with just inches between them.  One delivery driver came to my door not so long ago, muttering.  Mine was his last stop in Cambridge.  He couldn’t wait to get out.  ”Too many cars, on too narrow streets, headed right for you!  Whilst too many cycles seem as though they’ve got a right to the motorway!” he said with a certain exasperation that print can’t capture.  The rub is that these streets weren’t designed for the traffic that they carry today.

Something has to go first.  Rock-Paper-Scissors is as sensible as any rule of the road.

At another time, I might have been logging an experience from the road, in Ankara, Turkey.  There I once hired a taxi to take me from the city centre to the airport.  With all direct routes in grid-lock, the driver turned onto a one-way street.  We were headed in the direction we needed to go, but we were travelling against the traffic.  The experience was very much as David feels now.  It had movie-qualities.  Rush Hour 2.  Goods were flying and pedestrians, running for cover as the driver made a lane of the broad sidewalk.  Reading the fear telegraphed from my eyes into the rear-view mirror, the driver explained in broken English, “You pay me.  They no pay.”  I could only mutter: “Dış hatlar gidiş, lutfen.  Dış hatlar gidiş.”  International departures, please.